[ITmedia News] トイレでスマホいじりは「痔」になるリスク増?──米医療チームが発表 5分以上使用で5倍のリスク

· · 来源:tutorial在线

To put all this in the right context, let’s zoom in on the copyright's actual perimeters: the law says you must not copy “protected expressions”. In the case of the software, a protected expression is the code as it is, with the same structure, variables, functions, exact mechanics of how specific things are done, unless they are known algorithms (standard quicksort or a binary search can be implemented in a very similar way and they will not be a violation). The problem is when the business logic of the programs matches perfectly, almost line by line, the original implementation. Otherwise, the copy is lawful and must not obey the original license, as long as it is pretty clear that the code is doing something similar but with code that is not cut & pasted or mechanically translated to some other language, or aesthetically modified just to look a bit different (look: this is exactly the kind of bad-faith maneuver a court will try to identify). I have the feeling that every competent programmer reading this post perfectly knows what a *reimplementation* is and how it looks. There will be inevitable similarities, but the code will be clearly not copied. If this is the legal setup, why do people care about clean room implementations? Well, the reality is: it is just an optimization in case of litigation, it makes it simpler to win in court, but being exposed to the original source code of some program, if the exposition is only used to gain knowledge about the ideas and behavior, is fine. Besides, we are all happy to have Linux today, and the GNU user space, together with many other open source projects that followed a similar path. I believe rules must be applied both when we agree with their ends, and when we don’t.

FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition,这一点在有道翻译中也有详细论述

给 Lumia 10,详情可参考谷歌

If you're in CO, IL, or NY, these bills are still in committee. Comment on the record. System76's CEO met with the Colorado bill's sponsor on March 9 and the sponsor suggested excluding open-source software. The conversation is happening now.,更多细节参见移动版官网

రూల్స్ వివరంగా తెలుస్తాయి

Standardiz

关键词:给 Lumia 10Standardiz

免责声明:本文内容仅供参考,不构成任何投资、医疗或法律建议。如需专业意见请咨询相关领域专家。

分享本文:微信 · 微博 · QQ · 豆瓣 · 知乎

网友评论

  • 信息收集者

    作者的观点很有见地,建议大家仔细阅读。

  • 资深用户

    干货满满,已收藏转发。

  • 深度读者

    专业性很强的文章,推荐阅读。

  • 求知若渴

    作者的观点很有见地,建议大家仔细阅读。

  • 求知若渴

    难得的好文,逻辑清晰,论证有力。