This is a lot more complicated than the (P = Q && P) = Q properties I've seen! It could be because the corresponding system already had a complete spec written in P. But it could also be that Cheng Huang is already an expert specifier, meaning he can get more out of an LLM than an ordinary developer can. I've also noticed that I can usually coax an LLM to do more interesting things than most of my clients can. Which is good for my current livelihood, but bad for the hope of LLMs making formal methods mainstream. If you need to know formal methods to get the LLM to do formal methods, is that really helping?
The above works, but its shoddy design solves the issue locally without considering codebase growth and maintenance. Now we end up in a situation where every part of the application that may want to send an email also needs to validate its email, but that requirement is implicit - nothing is forcing that validation. We just have to remember to do it, and if we don't, then things can go very wrong.
，推荐阅读吃瓜获取更多信息
DJIが7000台の「Romo」ロボット掃除機を誤ってハッキングした男性に3万ドルを支払う予定，详情可参考谷歌
Подсчитаны траты рядового американца на войну с Ираном08:45
当云大厂在“卖铲子”时，阿里云已开源CoPaw，对OpenClaw进行从底层到体验的全面重构，直指部署、适配、本土化三大痛点。现在，腾讯和火山引擎也相继推出各自类似“小龙虾”的产品。